Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 241 - 260
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Free World Trust v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Free World Trust v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 11:57 am
Last week the IPKat, intrigued by a reference for a ruling for a preliminary ruling of the European Court of Justice in a case he knew nothing about, Case C-4/10 Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac v Oy Gust. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
Flanigan’s Enters., Inc. of Ga. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:33 pm
The title says it all: The Widow Clicquot: The Story of a Champagne Empire and the Woman Who Ruled It (2009).In a scant 200 pages, the book illuminates a central fact: the signature on each bottle's egg-yolk-orange label, "V Clicquot Ponsardin," is not the autograph of a fictitious woman conjured, like Betty Crocker, by an office-full of admen. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
So held Mr Justice Arnold this morning in Diageo v Intercontinental Brands [2010] EWHC 17 (Ch). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:00 am
Louis Roederer's Cristal-brand champagne sells for over $150/bottle. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
v=iMlTEStfQG8 The girl alleged she had been given multiple glasses of champagne and given part of a qualude, a powerful, then popular recreational narcotic that was eventually outlawed in the late 70s in the United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
v=iMlTEStfQG8 The girl alleged she had been given multiple glasses of champagne and given part of a qualude, a powerful, then popular recreational narcotic that was eventually outlawed in the late 70s in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:04 pm
I have yet to see evidence that this hairstyle has infected the legal profession but a bottle of champagne to the first solicitor, barrister or costs draftsman who can produce a picture of themselves about to enter court displaying such a haircut. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:59 am
Drink and drugs were the main preoccupation of some of Europe's finest legal brains this morning, when the Court of First Instance rendered its decision in Case Tâ€'234/06, Giampietro Torresan v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Klosterbrauerei Weissenohe GmbH & Co. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 10:07 pm
" Comite Interprofessionel du Vin de Champagne v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 2:16 pm
That’s how its decision in Champagne Louis Roederer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:00 pm
See Champagne Louis Roederer v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:05 pm
Champagne Louis Roderer v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision please use this link: Champagne v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 5:52 am
If the defendant had simply intentionally murdered someone, they would only be required to comply with these postrelease conditions for 36 months.The proportionality argument is that this lifetime postrelease sentence is unconstitutional under the three factors set forth in State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
Randall v. [read post]
