Search for: "Chapel v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 8:54 am
Three years later, “a South Carolina jury award[ed] the largest judgment ever against a hate group in Macedonia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm
In 2007, PromiseLand Church West, Inc. sought to develop a 53–acre project on Highway 71 in Austin to build a chapel, multipurpose building, and an outdoor amphitheater. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
” Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:00 am
American Humanist Association v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm
Ark., 393 U.S. 97, 106 (U.S. 1968) quoting McCollum v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am
Kohr’s lawsuit sparked comparison to the famous 1994 Liebeck v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 11:41 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:41 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Dayton, University of Connecticut, and Sharon V. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:07 am
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
In the Virginia case—titled Landini v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Cases like Katzenbach v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
In Brooks v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:37 am
” An Ohio state court disagreed, ruling last year that Auto-Owners had no duty to defend G & K under the policy. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 8:16 pm
Eastview Healthcare v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
The Supreme Court has ruled in a number of landmark cases involving religion before, notably in R (Hodkin & Anor) v Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages [2013] UKSC 77, where a Scientology chapel was deemed recordable as a “place of meeting for religious worship” under the Places of Worship Registration Act 1855, and in the first case decided by the Supreme Court, R(E) v Governing Body of JFS [2009] UKSC 1, regarding the definition of… [read post]
