Search for: "Citizen Action v. DOE"
Results 241 - 260
of 6,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 10:39 am
When a private employer stops paying a private employee because of the employee’s speech, that does not involve government action. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
Kentucky Waterways All. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
See Reece v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
The court denied its motions for rehearing but agreed to certify the following question as one of great public importance to the state’s highest court: “In a first-party breach of insurance contract action brought by an insured against its insurer, not involving suit under Section 624.155, Florida Statutes, does Florida allow the insured to recover extra-contractual, consequential damages? [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:50 am
The 7th Circuit in Schutte v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 10:42 pm
Citizens Nat'l Bank, 586 N.E.2d 840 (Ind. 1992))). [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
The above does not prove that adherence to originalism requires judges to strike down all affirmative action preferences by state governments. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:38 pm
However, in 2001 the Appeals Court did look to the Zoning Act for guidance in rejecting an enforcement action initiated 23 years after the City of Boston had issued a permit for the use of certain premises in violation of the Boston Zoning Code (Lapidus v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:08 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Similarly, in Preston v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:43 am
It also stated, as it had already held in the cases Pretty v UK and Haas v Switzerland, that the right to private life under article 8 ECHR does not entail an obligation for states to assist citizens seeking to commit suicide.FactsThe applicant was the widower of a woman who had been almost completely paralysed and in need of constant care since 2002. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
In reaching this decision, the court relied heavily on Doe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:35 am
Action Comm. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:47 am
The Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, for example, does not authorize class actions. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:51 pm
T-Mobile sought review of a Ninth Circuit decision that precluded enforcement of a class action ban on the ground that a recent "Third Circuit decision (Gay v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:30 am
In Williams v Homeland Insurance, the Fifth Circuit applied the "local controversy" exception of CAFA to the facts of the case, determining that a class arbitration is not, nor does it preclude a class action. [read post]
