Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional, et al. v. United States, et al."
Results 241 - 260
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
(The lead case is Al Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 9:16 am
Thus, even if one is ultimately of the view that Munaf and Omar (et al.) don't have strong substantive claims, it should be up to U.S. courts, to the extent that the petitioners allege the constructive custody of the United States, to decide. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
See Ali Awhani-Robar et al., Trend in Loaded Handgun Carrying Among Adult Handgun Owners in the United States, 2015-2019, Am. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 4:36 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Igartúa, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:44 pm
The question before the Court is a seemingly simple one: do the plaintiffs (Amnesty International et al.) possess standing to challenge FISA in the first place? [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
Friend et al. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:51 am
In State of Hawaii v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
ADA, Inc., et al., No. 4:01-CV-79 (E.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 646.214(b)(3) and (4), thereby preempting state-law claims of negligence.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of Texas)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief for Constitutional and Administrative Law ScholarsPetitioners' reply Title: Lonberg v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:49 am
Humanitarian Law Project, et al. (08-1498) and Humanitarian Law Project, et al., v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
Davis, et al held: Once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the Due Process Clause applies to all persons within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent....the aliens' liberty interest is not diminished by their lack of a legal right to live at large.... [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Among those discussed were Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Korematsu v. the United States : World War II Japanese-American internment camps. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
This Tuesday, the Supreme Court held in Jesner et al. v. [read post]
