Search for: "Clark v. Judge" Results 241 - 260 of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
D.C.): DCT Order Clark County et al Motion for Summary J Interior Opposition to Summary J Motion USET Amicus City of La Center Amicus Interior Revised Cowlitz Initial Reservation Opinion Interior Motion to Remand Clark County et al Opposition to Remand Motion Clark County et al Motion to Strike Interior Opposition to Motion to Strike Clark County et al Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Excerpt from Judge Rothstein’s opinion: Nor can the Federal… [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
D.C.): DCT Order Clark County et al Motion for Summary J Interior Opposition to Summary J Motion USET Amicus City of La Center Amicus Interior Revised Cowlitz Initial Reservation Opinion Interior Motion to Remand Clark County et al Opposition to Remand Motion Clark County et al Motion to Strike Interior Opposition to Motion to Strike Clark County et al Reply in Support of Motion to Strike Excerpt from Judge Rothstein’s opinion: Nor can the Federal… [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:41 am by PaulKostro
Div., A-4560-10T4, April 26, 2012: The decision to allow an expert to testify is within the trial judge’s discretion, and will be overturned on appeal only if the judge’s decision amounts to an abuse of that discretion. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:45 am by beckygillespie
The four finalists, in two-person teams, argued the school prayer case, Kennedy v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
Last week a five-judge bench consisting of Lords Walker, Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Collins heard an appeal in what is likely to become a landmark case in private international law and, specifically, cross-border insolvency. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
  It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 4:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Clarke precedent will allow absolutely frivolous contract and other claims to proceed against tribes on the Lewis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
In the recent case of Stonebridge Underwriting Limited v Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange [2010] EWHC 2279, Mr Justice Christopher Clarke considered whether a dispute based on a "typical London market slip policy" should be heard in London or Ontario, Canada. [read post]