Search for: "Clayton by Clayton v. Place"
Results 241 - 260
of 378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2022, 1:22 pm
FTC (2021)and now again in the pending case, Axon Enterprise Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm
The Education Department’s announcement comes a year after Bostock v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 4:51 pm
Clayton County, Georgia, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 4:51 pm
Clayton County, Georgia, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
As a result of this judgment, Martin received a suspended sentence of eight years of imprisonment and was placed on probation for five years. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
As a result of this judgment, Martin received a suspended sentence of eight years of imprisonment and was placed on probation for five years. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
” Marya v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
FINRA’s specific focus areas for 2018 will include: (i) fraud, particularly microcap fraud schemes that target senior investors; (ii) hiring and supervisory practices for high-risk firms and brokers; (iii) cybersecurity; (iv) anti-money laundering; (v) sales practices and product suitability for specific investors, including the supervisory, compliance, and operational infrastructure firms have put in place with respect to ICOs; and (vi) investor protections related to market… [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
(Final Order, FTC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:37 am
C.A.); Newby v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
They tend to focus on Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
FTC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
[iv] If there is no direct evidence of such an agreement, plaintiffs must show there was parallel action—where the defendants all acted in unison and the behavior “would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence unaided by an advance understanding among the parties”[v]—and “plus factors” which show collusion. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
The Trump administration also has been moving at what has been described as a “breakneck pace” to place its nominees in the federal judiciary. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
