Search for: "Cola v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 11:59 am
McKay v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:11 am
"The Supreme Court ruled that the Order was a valid exercise of the County Executive's power, was not an illegal act, and did not violate the State Constitution or the Municipal Home Rule Law [Godfrey v Spano, 15 Misc.3d 809]. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
Disability Benefits before age 62 are not entitled to a COLA (Cost of Linving) increase in benefits, a “triennial determination. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:33 pm
Marion Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 240 S.C. 383, 384, 126 S.E.2d 178, 179 (1962).For example, in Merchant v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 3:03 am
Case Name: Crayk, F/K/A/ Glover v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 3:03 am
Case Name: Crayk, F/K/A/ Glover v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:22 am
Citing to Martin v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:37 am
”In contrast, in Farber v City of Utica, 97 NY2d 476, the Court of Appeals ruled that the employer may reduce the §207-a supplement it paid to a firefighter receiving a disability retirement allowance from the Retirement System by the amount of any cost-of-living [COLA] adjustments to the retirement allowance being paid by the System to the retired firefighter. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:53 pm
(Connie Stafford v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:31 am
In Kane v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
Design patents in the modern era are seldom directed to fashionable carpet designs or classic Coca-Cola bottles; they are often sought, and issued, for relatively mundane design features. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:34 pm
This reasoning behind this was first expressed by our Supreme Court in the case of Escola v Coca Cola Bottling Co over fifty years ago. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
Other coverage comes from Katie Barlow and Nina Totenberg at NPR, while in his “Drama at the Court” series for ISCOTUSnow, Christopher Schmidt looks back at United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:10 pm
DOM beat us to the punch with his post on the excellent SCOTUS opinion in Wooden v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:57 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:00 am
Here, although they had an approved federal trademark registration which requires use in interstate commerce (and a COLA license), they were impeded by the local authority in one state. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
The best known example is Coca Cola. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:57 am
” That would be funny, except that it’s more of a sad commentary on the state of trademark law--expanded significantly by big trademark owners...like Coca-Cola--that I wouldn’t rule anything out. [read post]
