Search for: "Commonwealth v. Grant, R." Results 241 - 260 of 686
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am by Aaron Weems
The Honorable Theodore Fritsch Jr. granted the request of Sabrina Mauer to have her twelve year relationship with Kimberly Underwood declared a common law marriage. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, Judge Rakoff granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss with respect to the plaintiffs’ claims based on the 2012 Notes Offering as barred by the ’33 Act’s three-year statute of repose. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:25 am
The facts of the case in Pipeline Systems, Inc. and Continental Western Insurance Company v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his recent post-Koken decision addressing numerous Motions In Limine filed by both parties in a UIM/Bad Faith case in the matter of Clemens v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Under the doctrine of in pari delicto, “no court should be required to serve as paymaster of the wages of crime” (McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465, 469 [1960] [citation omitted]). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 12:01 pm
As an example, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently addressed what “requested” means in this context, in the case of The Village at Palmerton Assisted Living v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:48 am
For a similar definition of “sexual intercourse” (though outside the context of deciding whether an act constituted adultery), see Commonwealth v. [read post]