Search for: "Commonwealth v. Wells, D." Results 241 - 260 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
If the reckless person were tried for attempted murder, he’d be acquitted, because attempted murder generally requires a conscious purpose to kill, not just reckless endangerment. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
-Va.) and Representative Jim Himes (D. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:02 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
As Bob Ambrogi reports, on February 19, 2013, Massachusetts Superior Court Justice Peter Lauriat held a hearing in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Chapter 94 of Larson’s , which discusses this important subject, has been revised as well. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
Code § 2701, c) the equitable Clean Hands Doctrine’ and d) unidentified statutes concerning civil conspiracy.Padmanabhan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
Under subsection (2), in addition, the issuing authority must consider the following: (a) any family law orders in force in relation to the defendant, or any pending applications for family law orders in relation to the defendant, of which the issuing authority has been informed; (b) the accommodation needs of the protected person; (c) the defendant's criminal record as defined in the Criminal Records (Spent Convictions) Act ; (d) the defendant's previous conduct whether in relation to the… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:07 am by Paul Cassell
In response, the D.A.'s Office filed a brief asserting that it had "carefully reviewed the facts and law and determined that Wharton's ineffectiveness claim fulfills the criteria articulated in Strickland v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
§§ 1332(d), 1453 (CAFA) on the ground that such private individuals are real parties in interest.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (4th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of Washington Legal Foundation Christopher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]