Search for: "Compli, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 11,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
AIM ImmunoTech (Dec. 28, 2023), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a post-trial decision, held that certain advance notice bylaw amendments that had been adopted by AIM ImmunoTech Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
AIM ImmunoTech (Dec. 28, 2023), the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a post-trial decision, held that certain advance notice bylaw amendments that had been adopted by AIM ImmunoTech Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am by Rebekka Thomas (Bristows)
The Court also restated the principle established in Best Buy Co Inc v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espaňa SL [2011] EWCA Civ 618, that the recipient’s understanding of the communication should be assessed from the perspective of a reasonable person, with knowledge of the circumstances at the date of the communication. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:35 am by Zachary Alper
Intel argued that due to a recent change in ownership of Finjan, Inc., Intel was covered under Finjan’s license with VSLI because both Intel and Finjan were under the control of Fortress Investment Group LLC. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Melissa Tremblay
  These settlements included:   BioTel and LifeWatch– Overbilling Federal Health Care Programs $13 Million Settlement  BioTelemetry, Inc. and related company LifeWatch Services, Inc., two ambulatory heart monitoring companies, paid $13 million to settle allegations that they overbilled federal health programs for mobile cardiac telemetry services. Our client revealed Defendants’ fraud by filing a complaint under the False Claims… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
” Since the time to amend the pleading as of right had expired, and plaintiff hadn’t complied with the governing procedural prerequisite, the Appellate Division, Second Department, was of the view that omission rendered the amended complaint a “legal nullity,” which justified its dismissal as against those new parties.There was clearly no amending that.# # #DECISIONBodkin v 112 Automotive Ctr., Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am by Russell Knight
In Illinois, parties choosing to represent themselves without a lawyer must comply with the same rules and are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys” Holzrichter v. [read post]