Search for: "Cooper v. Providence Hospital"
Results 241 - 260
of 412
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
The Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:34 pm
The court decided a case, Tabata v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
The MDL court in Arnold and Scales therefore considered the joinder of the physician and hospitals in those actions to be “premature. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am
Cooper, 746 A.2d 615, 617-618 (Pa. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
See Emerson Hospital v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 5:06 am
Unless an exception applies, an employee’s complaint has to be filed within one year of the “date upon which the unlawful practice or refusal to cooperate occurred. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:23 am
While he was at the hospital, “`expressed interest in cooperating’” with law enforcement, which led a federal prosecutor to contact his lawyer, who said Williams “might be” interested in cooperating. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
., to pay insurance premiums, or to provide reimbursements for contraceptive purchases). [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 5:15 am
Father cooperated; however, Mother failed to cooperate and refused to provide access to her psychiatric and medical records. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:45 am
In Haag v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:15 am
Mulhall v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
That was the issue presented in the newly published trial court decision, A.W. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
Watson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:53 am
His additional “cat’s paw” claim was also unfounded, the Tenth Circuit held, rejecting the notion that the Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Staub v Proctor Hospital established a categorical rule that, if a biased supervisor’s animus leads in any way to an adverse job action, an employer is liable. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
The opinion, United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
In Matter of Dunn, Lake v M.P.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
When court resumed on April 25, the prosecution objected to letting Masucci testify because his name “not on the list of experts [Graham] provided to the State before trial, nor had the State been provided with Masucci's report prior to trial, and these failures constituted discovery rules violations. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am
All states have regulations requiring health care providers to report cases of listeriosis and public health officials try to interview all persons with listeriosis promptly using a standard questionnaire about high risk foods. [read post]
