Search for: "Cox v. Hand"
Results 241 - 260
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2020, 12:06 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
Unusually for a serious event, this programme features some very serious bloggers among the speakers: Matt Fisher (from the IPKat team), David Musker (Class 99) and Hugo Cox (The 1709 Blog). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Mesa v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:02 pm
Chris Castle: The BMG Rights v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:02 pm
Chris Castle: The BMG Rights v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, Global Global - General Candidates for post of WIPO Director General present their platforms: (WIPO), IP is not a thing: (Dilanchian), FOSS adoption and consumer welfare: (IPcentral) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Manufacturers becoming brand licensing companies: (IP ThinkTank), Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement moves forward: (Michael Geist) Global - Patents Office Open XML voted to become official standard, so out of Microsoft’s… [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:51 pm
Sheryl Cox’s concept of “patient-centered care” shortly after she published (Cox 2000). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
Session 3: Trade Secrets, Courtney Cox, Can the Law Force You to Lie? [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (COX, J.) [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 5:23 am
Cox (9th Cir. 2014) (and other cases citing it); see also Boule v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Amanda Rice argues remotely in Lange v. [read post]
