Search for: "Cox v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Federal Appellate Review post-Rita v United States Sherod Thaxton Book Reviews The Structure of Classical Public Law The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought Duncan Kennedy Barry Cushman Some Realism about Mass Torts Mass Torts in a World of Settlement Richard A. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm by Paul Bost
Battles between brand owners are frequently fought in the United States in two forums:  the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and federal district court. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
McAdams, Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v Hollingsworth, 74 U Chi L Rev 1795 (2007) Thomas J. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
Gore, Citizens United, the State of the Union address, or a confirmation hearing. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 7:40 pm
The low-down from the West Coast: In United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
 In 2009, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]