Search for: "Craft v. Attorney General of United States" Results 241 - 260 of 469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am by Nicholas Mosvick
United States, upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans by a 6-3 decision. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:33 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Indeed, the United States Supreme Court has held that when a defendant’s blood was taken without a warrant or his consent, the blood-test results were inadmissible. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am by Anthony Gaughan
” The reason is because the effort to ascertain a universally-applicable, general common law came to an end in the famous 1938 case of Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
  He has resolved disputes and crafted deals for more than two decades as a business and commercial litigator, general counsel, and president of a technology corporation. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
United Federation of Teachers et al., amici curiae. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The full court affirmed the denial of the attorneys’ fees by 7-4, holding that the American Rule applies, despite the fact that the Fourth Circuit had analyzed a similar provision and allowed the collection of such attorneys’ fees (898 F.3d 1177). [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:09 am by Scott Dodson
When the United States is not a party, the solicitor general does occasionally file amicus briefs on behalf of the United States in cases involving rule interpretation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“It’s by the chief justice of the United States a year after the 14th Amendment,” Kavanaugh said in a reference to Chase. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 1:09 pm by Bob Bauer, Jack Goldsmith
Under current law, dueling certifications–one from a governor, another from a secretary of state, perhaps still another from an attorney general–could end up being presented to Congress for counting, without a clear process to determine which certificate is legitimate. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:45 am by admin
Another major sticking point was Section 5, which singled out certain states like Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Virginia, as well as South Carolina, and certain counties in North Carolina, Arizona, Hawaii, and Idaho that would not be allowed to adopt new voting procedures unless they are pre-approved by the United States Attorney General or reviewed after the United States District Court for the District of Columbia… [read post]