Search for: "Crew v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
By way of background, the highly publicized Pro-Football Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
But a few things interested me on today’s list: – A grant in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
c) Mutiny or conspiracy of two or more members of the crew or other persons on board of a vessel on the high seas, for the purpose of rebelling against the authority of the Captain or Commander of such vessel, or by fraud or violence taking possession of such vessel. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:59 pm
Indeed, in State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:48 am
Exhausting the contract grievance procedure is not always a condition precident to challenging a disciplinary actionMancuso v Crew, NYS Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]If a collective bargaining agreement contains a “contract grievance procedure,” must an employee who has been disciplined exhaust the contract grievance procedure before he or she may challenge the disciplinary action pursuant to Section 75 of the Civil Service Law? [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:11 pm
Last May, I pondered why we had not seen an appeal by the federal government in Haro v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 7:09 am
Plaintiff was an officer aboard the car ferry M/V COLUMBIA, owned by the State of Alaska. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
(2) In a case when offense 23 of the annexed Schedule is committed on board an aircraft at any time from the moment when all its external doors are closed following embarkation until the moment when any such door is opened for disembarkation, such offense and any other offense covered by Article 2 committed against passengers or crew of that aircraft in connection with such offense shall be considered to have been committed within the territory of a Contracting Party if the aircraft was… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:42 am
Crews v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
They stated a claim that there was no probable cause to believe that they were going to interfere with a flight crew in violation of 49 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
The act by any person, being or not being one of the crew of a vessel, of taking possession of such vessel by fraud or violence. c. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:43 am
Many, many thanks to Danielle Citron and the Concurring Opinions crew for inviting me! [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:57 am
Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Court found with the 55th Arab Brigade in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 10:05 am
The interdependence of Brussels I bis Regulation and Rome II Regulation It is true that in the interpretation of Article 4(1) Regulation 864/2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, the CJEU ruled that, damages connected with the death of a person due to such an accident within the Member State of the trial court, suffered by the victim’s relatives residing in another Member State, must be characterized as “indirect results” of the said… [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
Given the discovery of the alleged undeclared cash on the yola, the sergeant and restauranteur are both facing prosecution in U.S.A. v. [read post]
