Search for: "Crutcher v. Crutcher" Results 241 - 260 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The latest installment in our continuing coverage of the Lago Agrio litigation is Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:28 am by admin
Eugene Scalia, a partner in Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, represented the Roundtable and Chamber in the case. [read post]
Editor’s Note: Eduardo Gallardo is a partner focusing on mergers and acquisitions at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  The Whistleblower Rules establish the standards and procedures the SEC will apply in awarding whistleblowers monetary compensation for providing tips about possible securities law violations that lead to successful SEC enforcement actions and define the contours for protections of whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act’s anti-retaliation provisions.[3] Eligibility for an award under the Whistleblower Rules generally can be summarized as follows: (i) a whistleblower, (ii) who… [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Miguel Estrada of Gibson, Dunn &; Crutcher argued for the government. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Andrew Goldberg
" [ Download Microsoft v. i4i Supreme Court Decision] Thomas  G. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Andrew Goldberg
" [ Download Microsoft v. i4i Supreme Court Decision] Thomas  G. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:21 am by Andrew Goldberg
" [ Download Microsoft v. i4i Supreme Court Decision] Thomas  G. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am by Jon Tracy
 U.S. v Averette (1970) significantly changed its applicability, as the Court of Military Appeals decided that the UCMJ only applied to civilians in times of formally declared war. [read post]