Search for: "D v. K" Results 241 - 260 of 3,541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 5:33 am
Thus, the following dollar limits will apply for 2010, each of which is the same amount as for 2009: --the limit under Section 402(g)(1) on the exclusion for elective deferrals which are described in Section 402(g)(3), and which are made under 401(k) and other plans, will be $16,500; --the limit under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(i) for catch-up contributions to a plan, other than a SIMPLE 401(k) plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or a SIMPLE IRA described in Section… [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
kе sure you have еnоugh dеduсtеd еvеrу wееk fоr fеdеrаl wіthhоldіng, оr уоu might have to pay mоrе tаx аt уеаr еnd. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 9:12 pm
In this case, the plaintiff, M&K Chemical Engineering Consultants, Inc., an engineering firm from Illinois bid a project to perform design work to replace a cooling system for a chemical reactor in St. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:55 am by Howard Knopf
Good news from on high, legally speaking:GRANTED WITH COSTS / ACCORDÉE AVEC DÉPENSSociety of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 10:48 pm
Just the fact it's in trial is their victory; the message read loud and clear not f--k with our powerful masters as they gobble up what's left of our country's wealth.I'm about to barf reading about the "David v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 D’Angelo v Kujawski   2018 NY Slip Op 05750  Decided on August 15, 2018  Appellate Division, Second Department stands for the proposition that once the law firm had notice of the claims, then substitution of the proper party as plaintiff did not prejudice the law firm. [read post]