Search for: "D. Barnett"
Results 241 - 260
of 725
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 4:10 pm
LexBlog has worked with Norton Rose Fulbright since 2012 but over the past year that partnership has ramped up as we’ve watched them now add ten publications to the LexBlog Network since the beginning of 2014—and over that time you’d have a tough time finding a better blog network from an Am Law 200 firm. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Liberals are fond of Franklin D. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:32 am
Randy Barnett, the Georgetown University professor who pursued the first case, told The Daily Telegraph in 2012 the remarks were a “gross mischaracterization of the relationship of the courts to Congress. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:04 pm
Jan. 21, 2010)[, aff'd, 658 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2011)]. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
” Michael Paulsen kicked off this round right here with his blog post The myth of judicial supremacy in which he claimed that what he called “the recurrent myth of ‘judicial supremacy’ in constitutional interpretation” was “wrongly ascribe[d] to the framing generation and to Marbury v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 10:03 pm
… [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 am
And I'd like to think that we were able to sift out most if not all of the passages of the first kind. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:42 pm
MDU Barnett Ltd. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Randy Barnett discusses a new cert. petition at the Court, “an interesting case out of the Fourth Circuit involving the suppression of free speech protesting a taking of private property. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 6:50 am
Barnett misunderstands me, then, when he says that my purpose in the essay was to “defen[d] constitutional originalism against the common legal academic trope that it consists of adherence to the ‘dead hand of the past. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
” Or, as he puts it: [D]espite its frequent invocation in the originalism debates, the dead-hand argument is not merely an argument against originalism. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Co., 78 N.J.Super. 505, 189 A.2d 459 (App.Div.1963), certif. granted 40 N.J. 499, 193 A.2d 137 (1963), aff'd 42 N.J. 308, 200 A.2d 322 (1964). [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 11:40 am
K.S.A. 21-4643(d). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:14 am
Barnette (1943), First Amendment law is “designed to avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:38 am
This pattern applies at all levels of the profession; as Barnett correctly perceived, elite law professors tend to fall way left on the political spectrum, but even big firm partners give more to D than R. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 11:06 am
The tallest was probably Tim Robbins, but taller than you’d expect were Tom Hanks and Kevin Spacey. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Anderson MWildeAnderson Stanford Don Anton DonKAnton Griffith (Australia) Laura Appleman lawandlitprof Willamette Deborah Archer DeborahNArcher New York Law School David Ardia dsardia UNC Kenneth Armstrong ProfKAArmstrong Cambridge Clark D. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Supp. 2d 1068, 1069 (D. [read post]
