Search for: "D. G. Adams"
Results 241 - 260
of 599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2015, 12:46 pm
Texas case that I’ve been following where one of my former students – Adam Baumli – is representing NexusCard who is asserting United States Patent No. 5,924,080 against a set of retailers. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
They will refer to the following non-exclusive factors[13]: [W]hether that person— a) would fairly and adequately act in the interests of the class members; b) does not have, in relation to the common issues for the class members, a material interest c) that is in conflict with the interests of class members; d) if there is more than one applicant seeking approval to act as the class representative in respect of the same claims, would be the most suitable; e) will be able to… [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm
In support of FERC, for the private firms, will be Washington, D.C., attorney Carter G. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:30 am
In The Wall Street Journal (subscription or registration required), Adam White reviews The Court and the World, the new book by Justice Stephen Breyer. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am
Gottbetter, Mitchell G. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 1:49 pm
Very truly yours, Stuart G. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 11:42 am
And Michael D. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:18 am
Adams, and Brian J. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:11 am
Przeworski, Adam. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am
., A FLORIDA CORPORATION D/B/A AMENITY SERVICES, INC., Petitioner, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
D. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
On March 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Adam Stewart v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
[This ruling is likely to be of particular interest to the smartphone industry (amongst others), where the recent design trend (e.g. iPhones and Samsung’s Galaxy S6) appears to be towards integrated storage only] The relevance of technological protection mechanisms (Question 1(c), (d) and 2; Ruling 6) Q. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Part II surveys the provisions of the draft AUMF that have generated the most controversy and debate, including: (a) its lack of a stated purpose; (b) the prohibition on “enduring offensive ground combat operations”; (c) its definition of “associated forces”; (d) its transparency and oversight provision; (e) its relationship to the Law of Armed Conflict; (f) its sunset clause; and (g) one final matter that has flown under the radar up to this point insofar… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Davidoff StevenDavidoff Ohio State Benjamin G. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:25 am
Yesterday the Justices issued one opinion in an argued case, vacating and remanding the decision of the Sixth Circuit in M&G Polymers v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Davidoff StevenDavidoff Ohio State Benjamin G. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
Taylor, Maurice G. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Adams & Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Murphy, Paul G. [read post]
