Search for: "D. R.C. V."
Results 241 - 258
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
Broom claimed that he did have good cause for not presenting the records in the state courts: the Supreme Court’s 1994 decision in State ex rel Steckman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
Mozilla stated “ If you’re still not sure why you’d want to block cookies, today we’re launching a project called Track THIS to help you recognize what they do”. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
LEXIS 2068; 2010 Ohio 2544 (Ohio 12th App 6/7/2010) “Because the requirements of R.C. 2953.23 were mandatory, the trial court did not have the discretion to consider a second, successive petition for postconviction relief that did not satisfy those requirements. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:34 am
R.C. 4733.16(D). [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
" The order did not define "personal identifying information," but the only statute that defines the phrase, R.C. 2913.49(A), defines it to include a person's "name. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am
Ohio’s criminal revenge porn statute, R.C. 2917.211, prohibits “revenge pornography” as a form of harassment. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:33 am
Ohio’s criminal revenge porn statute, R.C. 2917.211, prohibits “revenge pornography” as a form of harassment. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
But I recently came across a 2016 Ohio appellate case, State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Thus, the trial judge must personally review and evaluate the appropriateness of the death penalty, prepare an entirely new sentencing entry as required by R.C. 2929.03(F), and conduct whatever other proceedings are required by law and consistent with this opinion. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:33 am
Dist. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Young v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
See also Coffin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
R.C. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm
; R. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm
(v) If the order refusing leave to appeal is a speaking order, i.e., gives reasons for refusing the grant of leave, then the order has two implications. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
La segunda década, vino de la mano del Tribunal Constitucional que al estilo del aperturista Concilio Vaticano II, dictaminó que se podía controlar la valoración de los Tribunales calificadores en caso de “errores manifiestos”, o cuando tratándose de exámenes tipo test, la discrecionalidad resultaba “cero”. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Gordon-McCutchan, R.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Gordon-McCutchan, R.C. [read post]
