Search for: "D. STRICKLAND"
Results 241 - 260
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2011, 7:14 pm
(d) A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent, but a lawyer may discuss the legal consequences of any proposed course of conduct with a client and may counsel or assist a client to make a good faith effort to determine the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law.Ohio's Rule (see here) is identical in substance, though slightly different in organization.Most of the time, these… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am
Perez, No. 8:02CR296, 2010 WL 4643033, at *2 (D. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:38 am
In short, the court makes much of Strickland’s first prong, the deficiency of counsel’s performance, while giving relatively short shrift to the question of how Moore was prejudiced by it. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
"Baston's attorneys compare this case to that of Jeffrey D. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Michael D. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Criminal law -- Habeas corpus -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness -- Petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief ordered by Court of Appeals, where state-court decision concluding that defendant had not established ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland was not unreasonable application of either part of Strickland rule -- Under 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d), federal habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state court has adjudicated on the merits,… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm
§ 2254(d). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:35 am
Having decided that § 2254(d) applies, the Court then applied settled principles of AEDPA deference in the familiar context of Strickland ineffective-assistance claims. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
It all ties together.The standards created by Strickland and §2254(d) are both "highly deferential," id., at 689; Lindh v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:36 pm
., the Court adopted the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
§ 782.104(a)(1)(2)(d). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:07 am
Jay Rockefeller (D., W.Va.) got the ball rolling in the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:23 pm
Sure, I'd love that slot!) [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:20 am
I'd already written some. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
§2254(d)(1) (emphasis added). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:03 am
Strickland appointed his running mate, Yvette McGee Brown, to the position on the Supreme Court being vacated by present Justice Maureen O’Connor, who won election to the Chief’s spot. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
8:02CR296 (D. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
In the election for Chief Justice, Maureen O’Connor trounced Eric Brown, whom Governor Strickland had appointed to the position after Tom Moyer’s death this past summer. [read post]
