Search for: "DAVID SEGAL"
Results 241 - 260
of 420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
“Larry” Liebesman and David B. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:38 am
NYT: Bruce Ackerman's letter to the editor in response to the recent article by David Segal. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 2:42 am
At the risk of not being invited back, I'll start with a post on harmless error -- a terminally unsexy topic that nonetheless is much on my mind as I prepare to teach Post-Conviction Remedies next semester.What makes this particularly noteworthy is its direct contrast to fellow Marquette lawprof David Papke, who penned the infamous words, "We don’t want law school to be lawyer-training school. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
And as I follow (somewhat anxiously) David Segal’s and others’ sustained attacks on contemporary legal education, I have also begun to wonder about the potential intersections of tenure reform and pedagogical reform. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:36 am
After reading a relatively benign post directed toward nipping at the edges of David Segal's New York Times article castigating law schools for their failure to do everything from teach students to be lawyers to make a decent cup of joe, it struck me that DiGirolami's post served to inadvertently bolster one of Segal's more potent criticisms, that legal scholarship was useless and irrelevant. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:06 pm
Dean David Levi of Duke Law School recently wrote a letter to the editor of the Times on this subject, which the paper did not print. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:15 am
– Professor Noah Feldman, in an interesting and provocative Bloomberg opinion piece (via Overlawyered), responding in part to David Segal’s latest New York Times piece criticizing legal education. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:25 am
The article is What They Don’t Teach Law Students: Lawyering” and subtitled “Schools Leave Practical Training to Firms by David Segal. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
Segal have shown, from 1953 to 2004, the Supreme Court supported claims of deprivation of First Amendment liberties in 53.95 percent of argued cases. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:46 am
Segal have shown, from 1953 to 2004, the Supreme Court supported claims of deprivation of First Amendment liberties in 53.95 percent of argued cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
" And, of course, David Segal's NYT article, which seemed to imply a connection between rising law school costs, writing law review articles, and not teaching law students practical skills. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:35 am
BuchananIn my post last Tuesday, adding to Professor Dorf's response to the now-infamous NYT article in which David Segal critiqued (nearly every aspect of) American law schools, I defended the "case method. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:28 am
So here are no-friend-of-the-status-quo Jim Chen’s links to David Segal’s critiques of legal education and the academy’s reaction. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:16 am
The case is before Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle in U.S. district court in Washington. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:50 pm
BuchananProfessor Dorf's post here on Monday mentioned a front-page article from Sunday's New York Times, in which David Segal assailed the supposed problem that law schools do not teach "lawyering. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Last week the NYT’s David Segal attacked modern legal education in what many bloggers have criticized as an overwrought and inaccurate article. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
The recriminations from David Segal's New York Times article on law schools continue, most beginning with some variation of a disclaimer, with this being the best: On the topic of scholarship and lawyering inspired by Segal's NYT bile pile, I've mostly refrained from weighing in. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 7:14 am
I have stayed out of the fray over David Segal's attack on legal education, leaving it to the many others who have done a masterful job of taking the piece apart. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:45 am
For all its faults, ably documented both here on Prawfs and across the web, David Segal's NYT piece about law schools is another reminder (as if we needed one) of the importance of continually thinking about how we train lawyers. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 8:51 pm
Much has already been written about David Segal’s article in the N.Y. [read post]
