Search for: "DC v. Minor"
Results 241 - 260
of 420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 1:51 pm
Huff v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:11 am
Adelson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:34 pm
But among originalists, they are the minority views. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
Prior to the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (now commonly referred to as "Title VII"), 1964, women and minorities had no protection against on the job harassment or discrimination. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
It is also the case that, as a result of FISA and other things, Article III judges can receive highly sensitive classified information ex parte; in Washington, DC, the infrastructure for doing this already exists. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Yet the GOP Congressional minority has refused to allow the President to implement the policies on which he was elected, and which are much needed to get Americans working again. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:57 am
D.C. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:05 pm
To be sure, the minority commissioners can write vociferous dissents and try to signal to the DC Circuit that there are problems, like in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm
Connelly v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
Dauber * Third Circuit Schizophrenia Over Student Discipline for Fake MySpace Profiles * Private High School Not Liable for Cyberbullying--DC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
The “fiscal cliff” disaster makes clear that partisan gridlock is a dire problem in Washington, DC. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:18 pm
§ 314.94(a)(12)(v), “if the [ANDA] is for a drug or method of using a drug claimed by a patent and the applicant has a licensing agreement with the patent owner,” the application must contain a Paragraph IV certification as to that patent “and a statement that it has been granted a patent license. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument this morning in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
Both suffered minor injuries. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
Both suffered minor injuries. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:32 pm
In Herbert v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
Delsman Satirical Anti-Birther Blog Post Protected by DC's Anti-SLAPP Law--Farah v. [read post]
