Search for: "DH v. People" Results 241 - 260 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm by Matthew Kahn
  As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Alex Loomis posted a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Ziglar v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Department of Defense) Recent Stories on Constitution Daily Justice Gorsuch joins the court - again President acts to keep immigration order alive Podcast: Loving v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
In suspending the entry of more than 180 million nationals from six countries, suspending entry of all refugees, and reducing the annual cap on the admission of refugees from 110,000 to 50,000, the president did not meet the essential precondition of making a sufficient finding that the entry of those classes of people would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States” (State of Hawaii v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
As nations debate the causes and treatments for climate change, people everywhere are struggling to adapt to new environmental realities. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
As nations debate the causes and treatments for climate change, people everywhere are struggling to adapt to new environmental realities. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm by Hannah Dockendorff
As nations debate the causes and treatments for climate change, people everywhere are struggling to adapt to new environmental realities. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm by Matthew Kahn
The 435,000 people currently eligible for the program must seek renewed status every 18 months from DHS. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]