Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 241 - 260
of 112,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 9:49 am
It basically says that just because a police officer witnesses what appears to be a drug transaction, and is justified in stopping the defendant, this does not necessarily mean that the cop has a right to pat-frisk the suspect for weapons. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
[A]lthough [plaintiff] contends that it previously disclosed a general theory of lost profits damages that does not rely on either expert testimony or the Panduit factors, [plaintiff] did no such thing. . . . [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
SO DOES THIS HELP, OR HURT? [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
The post Does Crawford Apply in Pretrial Proceedings? [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 5:32 pm
And if so, how does he do it? [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:05 am
Offence or Defense: Does the Law Care? [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
Specifically who has has the burden of proof of compliance or non-compliance and what does that burden entail? [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:15 am
Indeed, Defendants do not challenge that assertion. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 11:08 am
However, if the underlying complaint clearly fails to allege facts that fall within the policy’s coverage, the insurer does not owe you a duty to defend. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:39 am
The defendant does not have to pay any money as a guarantee. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 7:19 am
Accordingly, as Plaintiff does not intend to call [him] to testify on its behalf and as Defendants have not met their burden of showing that [his] testimony would be adverse to Plaintiff, the Court will not disqualify [the attorney] on the basis of [the Florida Advocate Witness Rule]. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 12:09 pm
If an insurer promises to advance “claim expenses” (including attorneys fees) arising from covered claims, does California’s broad duty to defend principles apply, such that the insured need only show the potential for coverage or must the insured show that the expenses were actually incurred defending a covered claim? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:58 am
Magistrate rules that the right to speedy trial in US does not apply in extradition proceeding. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Luke William Hunt (University of Alabama), Does Criminal Responsibility Rest Upon a False Supposition? [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:43 am
"While [defendant] may argue that [previously disclosed reference] anticipates the patent-in-suit, it does not follow that [defendant] can argue that [the component] alone anticipates or renders obvious the patent-in-suit even though [the component] is a component of [the previously disclosed reference]. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
” Id. at *8 (internal quotations and citations omitted).Of Note: Doe does notstand for a “per se rule that the public authority defense must always be proven by the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:34 am
If the state does not produce sufficient evidence the trespass was willful, a conviction for trespass in an unoccupied conveyance will not stand. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:26 am
Prisons are overcrowded, millions of free citizens live with years of probation hanging over their head, prisoner reform does not work, and the Courts and public defenders in many States are completely overwhelmed. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:09 am
[Plaintiff] does not allege that [defendant] had knowledge of, or was willfully blind to, the patents-in-suit at the time [plaintiff] alleges [defendant] failed to comply with [its patent clearance] internal policy. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:51 am
It most frequently occurs when the plaintiff has no or very limited legal right to sue the third party defendant, but the defendant does. [read post]
