Search for: "DOE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al"
Results 241 - 260
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, NAACP v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Does any monograph count? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
As an aside, Judge Kennedy is the first judge before whom I did a civil jury trial, in 1997 in the District of Columbia Superior Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
American Public Health Association et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:39 pm
The DC Circuit’s opinion in National Association of Manufacturers et. al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Realty One Group, et al.[8], one of the defendants, Michael Nelson, posted 5 paragraphs of a Las Vegas Review-Journal article, titled “Program may level housing sale odds”, on his website. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:27 am
[Alaska, Indiana, Tennessee, Utah, District of Columbia]Ten states & D.C. have deemed as official one or more of their online primary legal resources. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
By the en banc majority's theory, lightly premised on a tendentious reading of the Supreme Court's District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Carry outside the home is the norm throughout most of the country, including many large urban areas, such as the District of Columbia, Chicago, Miami, Philadelphia, San Juan, Seattle, and Houston. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
[1] CV-19-00631637-0000, Sophia Mathur, et al v Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario [2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, www.ipcc.ch. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
(Class 99) District Court Delaware: Grant of preliminary injunction does not establish objective recklessness for wilfulness: Cordis Corporation v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
Titan Corporation et al. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Ft. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat),… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
