Search for: "DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive" Results 241 - 260 of 584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
  It signals again further movement, perhaps now substantially irreversible, away from the cornerstone of US (and global) policy from the 1990s through about 2'13-2016 of a commitment to build a unitary global economic space through which public-private interlinking could structure a seamless  connection between markets driven allocation and the normative principles within which such activity could be conducted. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
” [22] On January 17, 2014, during an interview with the british interviewer Andrew Marr, Vladimir Putin said that the law “does not discriminate against gay people” [23]. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Gary Botwinick
 Importantly, the Senate’s deduction for pass-through income does not apply to businesses held in estates or trusts, which may cause taxpayers to reconsider transferring business interests to trusts and the benefits of transfers out of trusts to individual beneficiaries. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Gary Botwinick
 Importantly, the Senate’s deduction for pass-through income does not apply to businesses held in estates or trusts, which may cause taxpayers to reconsider transferring business interests to trusts and the benefits of transfers out of trusts to individual beneficiaries. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:10 am by Gary Botwinick
 Importantly, the Senate’s deduction for pass-through income does not apply to businesses held in estates or trusts, which may cause taxpayers to reconsider transferring business interests to trusts and the benefits of transfers out of trusts to individual beneficiaries. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Yet, Spokeo also confirmed that in some cases, a violation of a statutory right does amount to a concrete harm, even where that harm is intangible. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
It always does, especially so where a “over-up” is attempted as have CGSB and the Standards Council. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
We are very serious about safety and will not require anyone to report to work in-person until we and you are 100% comfortable. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 10:09 am by Tia Sewell
Wednesday, November 25, 2020, at 1:00 p.m.: Lawfare Live will host a conversation with the editors. [read post]
The change of administration at the SEC and the issuance of SLB 14L appear to have served as an open season call for shareholder proponents: the number of proposals submitted surged, the percentage of proposals that shareholders were willing to withdraw as a result of negotiations dropped, and the number of proposals excluded through the no-action process plummeted. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Finally, Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia tax groceries at a reduced rate (with Utah recently adopting a credit to go along with the reduced rate).[1] Table 1. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cir. rules have made royalties supercompensatory through various rules.Seems backwards for three reasons. (1) Greater notice failures exist in IP. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 5:16 am by Justin Sherman
Just days before that, Indiana’s governor signed a comprehensive privacy bill, which enters into effect on Jan. 1, 2026. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm by Giles Peaker
Does the policy have a legitimate aim of sufficient importance that it could justify a restriction on the claimant’s right not to be discriminated against? [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
In a footnote on page 1, Professor Lemley discloses that he "has represented Google in matters related to the subject of this Article, but Google has provided no financial support for this project and the views offered here have neither been reviewed nor approved by Google". [read post]