Search for: "DOES 1-245" Results 241 - 260 of 695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm by Susan Klein
§ 3553(b)(1), which required the court to sentence within the guideline range, and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:21 pm by Rachel Sandler
The NCAA does pursue those it believes violate trademark rights in “March Madness. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
However, the patent is not insufficient simply because the specification does not enable that improvement. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
That decision does not support Ms. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 5:33 am by Simon Lester
(In Opinion 1/94, on the competence to conclude the WTO Agreements covering services and intellectual property, the Commission did not ask this question). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 3:31 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Section 103 does not require the petitioner to file an amended petition where: (1) the employer is involved in corporate restructuring; (2) a new corporate entity takes over the interests and obligations of the petitioner, and no changes in employment; or (3) the H-1B holder moves to a new location with the same employer and the employer secures a certified LCA. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:06 am by LEANNE WOODS, 1 CROWN OFFICE ROW
It was also correct that operational discretion does not equate to immunity from judicial scrutiny of policing decisions (H v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2013] 1 WLR 3021). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Steffen, 112 Nev. 369, 373-75, 915 P.3d 245, 248 (1996). [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
In New Jersey their office is located 1 Executive Drive, Somerset, New Jersey 08873. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In other words, where, as here, a proposed amended complaint contains an untimely claim against a defendant who is already a party to the litigation, the relevant considerations are simply (1) whether the original complaint gave the defendant notice of the transactions or occurrences at issue and (2) whether there would be undue prejudice to the defendant if the amendment and relation back are permitted (see CPLR 203[f]; CPLR 3025[b]; see Buran, 87 NY2d at 178; Caffaro v… [read post]