Search for: "Daniels v. Said" Results 241 - 260 of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 4:15 pm by Josh Richman
”  For the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint For Exhibit A to the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint-exhibit For Exhibit B to the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint-exhibit-b For more on this case:… [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:38 am by Daniel Schwartz
Daniel SchwartzIn legal circles, we’ve all been anxiously awaiting a result in the case of Eagle v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:49 pm
Pate said he's had no experience with such circumstances, which are the result of former Circuit Court Judge Daniel Donahue's resignation in May. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
In Daniels v State of NSW in 2015, she had ruled that the satisfaction of the element of reasonableness was one for the jury. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
The introduction to the Federal Court of Australia’s opinion in Universal Music Publishing v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:05 am
Employer does not have to pay benefits to former employees guilty of embezzling William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Wright, 2009 NY Slip Op 03164, Decided on April 21, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe William Floyd Union Free School District asked Supreme Court to relieve it of its contractual obligation to provide postretirement health and dental insurance benefits to Daniel C. [read post]
22 May 2015, 11:12 am
But it’s a travesty that this case was ever filed in the first place,” said EFF Staff Attorney Daniel Nazer, who is also the Mark Cuban Chair to Eliminate Stupid Patents. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
Daniel Hemel is an assistant professor of law at the University of Chicago Law School. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
[This de novo statutory interpretation, decontextualized from the precedent, reminded me of the rogue “plain language” appellate court decision in Daniel v. [read post]