Search for: "Daniels v. Said" Results 241 - 260 of 1,930
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Officials said while Vázquez Garced was governor in 2019 and 2020, she allegedly took campaign donations from a banker, Julio Martin Herrera Velutini, and a former FBI agent, Mark Rossini, who was consulting for the bank. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Daniel Byman analyzed the Justice Department’s affidavit of the IRGC member. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 1:40 pm by Tamara Robb
” Anonymous v Anonymous The January 2016 decision made in Gottlieb v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Buyer purchased more than $500,000 of Sprint shares, which were then sold shortly after news of the deal went public, regulators said. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
I do go on to offer my own interpretations of the specific determinations that have come to characterize the American constitutional order, both in its written and unwritten aspects, but these are (as I said at CGC 12) detachable from the book’s general methodological theses; one can subscribe to the latter while agreeing, or contesting, the analyses of American particulars. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins J gave judgment in the case of Dew v Mills Nanyn . [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 5:26 am
"Said Sarah Molina, 25, a "newly single" "event planner in Phoenix" who had been eager "to get back on the dating scene" until the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Fifth Circuit (merits panel, 2022): There was no "surprise switcheroo"; the agency always said such studies "might" be helpful. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While our cases prohibiting viewpoint discrimination would fetter the state's power to some degree, see R.A.V. v. [read post]