Search for: "Dave Hoffman"
Results 241 - 260
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr explains why – contrary to arguments made by others, including Lithwick – the extensive factual record in the case will not “matter very much” if the case reaches the Court; Dave Hoffman makes a similar argument at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:21 pm
Do nothing: Looks like I'm not the only wishing I'd written Dave Hoffman’s post, but since he got there first, let me polish the apple a bit: Instead of passing new laws, how about actually enforcing the laws already on the books? [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:31 am
Dave Hoffman on asteroidgate.) [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 10:00 pm
Monica Jain & Eric Anderson, Yudelka Tapia, Matthew Silverstein, Daniel Dromm, Diane West, Mark Levine, Veronica Vera, Ken Diamondstone, Jamin Sewell, Mark Callendar, Demetrius Bagley, Dave Kerpen, Robyn Lazara, Julian Franklin, Matthew Carlin, Miguelina Camejo, Mary Beth & Robert Aberlin, Barbara & Barry Katz, Andreas Turanski and Aubrey LeesComplimentary vegan hors d'oeuvres and open bar featuring organic wines and beersGift bags for all attendees(Interested… [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:03 pm
CoOp contributor Dave Hoffman stated: “So it is an empirical question – isn’t it? [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 7:09 am
., from Dave Hoffman here), but not as much attention as it deserves. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 1:53 pm
But Dave Hoffman at Concurring Opinions just wrote on The Flat Legal Blogosphere And What to Do About It, and I'd like to hit a few points despite the fact I'm just a rookie.First, read his post at the link above and then come back.Welcome back (and yes, I stole his naval gazing graphic). [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:07 am
And over at Concurring Opinions, Dave Hoffman provides some additional lawprof color, as he's taken the decidedly minority view within the Academy that disconnecting tenure from accreditation won't be the end of civilization as we know it. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 5:50 am
The practical blawgosphere, a name coined by a guy I called the Texas Tornado, Mark Bennett, was born of a question posed in 2007 by law professor Dave Hoffman at his blog, Concurring Opinions. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:06 pm
–Jacob Hoffman-Andrews "The Coming Swarm" by Molly Sauter With new technology comes new forms of protest. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 2:36 am
At Concurring Opinions, Dave Hoffman raises some interesting questions. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
In the recent book “The Startup of You” authors Ben Casnocha and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman introduce the idea of “permanent beta”: We are all works in progress. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:39 am
As Dave Hoffman will tell you, this is what is known as "puffery. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 8:44 pm
Dave Hoffman at Concurring Opinions wants to know what the big fuss is about the Duke 88. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:58 pm
Mark Draughn, Joel Rosenberg, Carolyn Elefant, Eric Turkewitz, Eugene Volokh, Orin Kerr, Dave Hoffman, Frank Pasquale, Dan Markel, Dan Solove, Ken, Ken Lammers, Anne Reed, Howard Bashman, Walter Olson, Marc John Randazza, Jim Chen, Charon, Radley Balko, Geeklawyer, Jamie Spencer, Skelly, Jon Katz, Jonathon Turley, Lyle Denniston, Douglas Berman, Scott Henson, David Lat, Niki Black and the departed Norm Pattis.I'm sure I've left some off, because I am not… [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:03 am
Bartow's Definition of an Internet Bully This is a two-post combo from Dave Hoffman at Co-Op, but follows up the comments to Paul Horwitz at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:33 am
UPDATE: Of course, co-blogger Dave Hoffman was way ahead of the trend. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 12:30 pm
All the best, Dave Wieneke Email this to a friend? [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:31 pm
Dave Hoffman over at Concurring Opinions had a piece last summer about Wikipedia users at major law firms changing entries to "burnish their reputations and trash their competitors. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:34 am
Admittedly, I was shocked at my commentators’ near-unanimity in support of the ban, and that’s not even including those who simply attacked the motives of their opponents and used the kind of rhetoric that Dave Hoffman advised against here. [read post]
