Search for: "David J. Miller" Results 241 - 260 of 647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
David Donoghue of DLA Piper in his Chicago IP Litigation Blog [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:28 pm
Hartmann of Kean Miller on the firm's Louisiana Law Blog Business Alert: Is It Negligent for a Business in NJ Not to Have an Effective Sexual Harassment Policy? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:11 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Hydraulic Fracturing and Gasland: Separating Fact from Fiction - New Orleans attorney Keith Hall of Stone Pigman Walther Wittmann on the firm's Oil & Gas Law Brief Battle of the Branches: The Debate Rages on Regarding the Proper Breadth of Federal Cybersecurity Laws - Michael J. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:15 pm by News Desk
Miller, Sarah Beno and Laura Carroll, graduate student Jiahui Jian, technician David J. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 2:11 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Moderated by Stephen Susman, Partner, Susman Godfrey; Executive Director, Civil Jury Project, NYU School of Law A View from the Bench The Honorable William Young, Judge, US District Court for the District of Massachusetts A View from the Bar Arthur Miller, University Professor, NYU School of Law A View from the Boardroom Robert Gasaway, Partner, Kirkland & Ellis 12:00-12:30 pm Panel IV: What Innovations Judges, Court Systems, and Citizens Can Adopt to Save the Civil Jury Trial Panel… [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) AAA v Associated Newspapers heard 17 to 20, 25 and 26 June 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Desmond v Foreman, heard 2 to 3 July 2012 (Tugendhat J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
Mar. 28, 2012); Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 7:56 am by J. Dana Stuster
As former negotiator Aaron David Miller wrote last week, that would be a mistake: Trump would be giving away U.S. leverage and putting the brakes on any chance of resuming the peace process. [read post]