Search for: "Dept of Corrections" Results 241 - 260 of 1,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Despite knowing this statement was untrue, neither Sozio nor Howard corrected Simpson at or after the meeting, or otherwise disclosed the higher Peebles/Integrated offer (id. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:11 pm
“We urge the U.S. to correct its mistakes,” Wang Wenbin told a news conference on Tuesday, adding that China would take all necessary measures to protect its companies’ legitimate rights. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing  Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, the court explained that an arbitration award may not be vacated unless it shown to violate a strong public policy,  is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing  Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, the court explained that an arbitration award may not be vacated unless it shown to violate a strong public policy,  is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Gregor v Rossi, 120 AD3d 447 [1st Dept 2014] [“Plaintiffs subjective belief did not create an attorney-client relationship or a close relationship approaching privity that imposed upon defendants a duty to them to impart correct information … “]). [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[T]he failure to show proximate cause mandates the dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardless of whether the attorney was negligent” (Wo Yee Hing Realty Corp. v Stern, 99 AD3d 58, 63 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holdings alleges “specific facts upon which the existence of an attorney-client relationship or privity between the parties could be inferred” (Conti v Polizzotto, 243 AD2d 672, 673 [2d Dept 1997]). [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it has been held that one may assume a duty, which initially did not exist, and may be held liable where his or her affirmative action adversely affected that plaintiff and he or she failed to act reasonably (see Arroyo v We Transport,  Inc., 118 AD3d 648, 649 [2d Dept 2014]; Gordon v Muchnik, 180 AD2d 715 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk,  1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of correction… [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:20 am by Tom Kosakowski
(Dept of Ed Pres Release.)Related posts: Harvard Law Case Study Focuses on Ombuds and the 'Dear Colleague Letter'; IOA Takes a Stand on Title IX Issues; Watch Senator Question White House Title IX Expert on Role of Campus Ombuds; IOA Releases Memo Providing Legal Grounds for Ombuds Confidentiality in Title IX Matters; IOA Compiles Title IX Resources; IOA Surveys Higher Education Ombuds Confidentiality for Clery Act & Title IX Matters; U.S. [read post]