Search for: "Desist v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05 Cress v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:28 am
§1337 - aka ITC Section 337 - permits the ITC to investigate alleged unfair competition resulting from the importation of goods into the United States where those goods would, among other possible harms - infringe a valid and enforceable US patent. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
From Renna v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
Su Bin was residing in China when the complaint was filed and consented to be conveyed to the United States. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
Constitution's Supremacy Clause, "the laws of the United States . . . shall be the supreme law of the land . . . the law of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:34 am
(d/b/a PPC, Inc.) v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
Arora v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
On October 15, 2007, Funai Electric Co., Ltd. and Funai Corporation (collectively, “Funaiâ€) filed a complaint alleging violations of Section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital televisions by reason of infringement of U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am
And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:01 pm
Further, Nokia alleges that it satisfies the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement through “substantial investments in the United States in the exploitation of the Asserted Patents. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:19 pm
With the looming uncertainty of the FTC’s restitution and disgorgement authority in light of the Supreme Court’s consideration of AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:50 pm
#14: United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:15 pm
Samsung or Oracle v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
(PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches websites to discuss patent and trademark procedures (inovia) US Patent Reform Will patent reform come up in a big way in the 112th Congress? [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:30 am
The mark was registered on November 29, 2011 as United States Trademark Registration No. 4,062,744. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
EAI operates a franchise network of over 1,200 independent owner-operated franchise locations throughout the United States and internationally. [read post]
