Search for: "District of Columbia v. Little" Results 241 - 260 of 1,090
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am by Charlotte Butash, Margaret Taylor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, in two cases concerning Congress’s Article III standing to sue over alleged executive branch illegality: Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:08 am by Rebecca Green
Liquidating the actions of federal bodies is much more straightforward than attempting to nail down settled practice in 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit v Ontario Nurses’ Association, the Ontario Labour Relations Board did not consider a nurse who had been involved in pandemic planning as exercising managerial functions under the Labour Relations Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Margaret Taylor
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the appointment of Kenneth Cuccinelli as acting U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit would have ruled in a different case that the CFPB’s structure is unconstitutional, expressed concern that a “watered down” standard would make other agencies with similar removal restrictions less independent. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:12 pm by Kevin Kaufman
It makes little sense to allow these matters to be treated as fraud. 2. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am by Nicholas Mosvick
Childrens’ Hospital, striking down a minimum wage act for women in the District of Columbia under Lochner. [read post]