Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 241 - 260
of 8,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 10:02 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Trademark lawyers for Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of California filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Hook's Apothecary, Inc. of Indiana, as well as unidentified Doe Defendants 1 through 20, infringed the following Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. trademarks: GO DROPLESS! [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:54 am
Absent a showing of prejudice to the defendant, procedural noncompliance does not compel invalidation of the warrant or suppression of its fruits. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 4:17 am
Ct. at 1884, 20 L. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 7:53 am
March 20, 2008) [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:46 am
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. et al, 1-13-cv-08137 (NYSD October 20, 2015, Order) (Freeman, M.J.) [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:22 pm
What does come in, is a guilty plea. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 9:00 am
Courts have variously put caps at a 10:1 ratio compared to the other damages in the case, but a 2018 case did uphold a 20:1 ratio, recognizing that lighter conduct might not qualify for such a high ratio. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am
While the parties agreed that the 20-employee minimum applies to “a person engaged in an industry affecting commerce” and that the term “person” does not include a political subdivision of a state, they disputed whether the 20-employee minimum also applies to a “political subdivision of a State. [read post]
20 May 2014, 12:10 pm
When does a court sua sponte have to order a competency hearing? [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:57 am
On July 20, 2021, plaintiff’s attorney served notice of entry by e-filing in NYSCEF of the court’s decision on Motion Sequence #1, defendants’ pre-answer motion to dismiss. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 9:27 am
For reasons the Circuit opinion does not fully explain, Ms. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm
Amplidata, Inc., 1-11-cv-04890 (ILND December 20, 2011, Order) (Kocoras, J.) [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:47 pm
The defendant explained that she did not tell Brooks that she had driven 20 minutes earlier and instead was confused by Brooks’ question. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:06 am
Alexander over 20 years ago. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
April 20, 2009). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:57 pm
See G.S. 20-4.01(1b)(defining alcohol concentration as grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of (whole) blood); G.S. 20-138.1 (a)(2) (defining impairment as an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more); see also Mac Cardwell, 133 N.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
§§ 921(a)(20)(B) and 922(g)(1); and (2) whether an individual may be barred from exercising Second Amendment rights upon conviction of a non-aggravated common law misdemeanor. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
" LaFave, 1 Search and Seizure § 2.6 at 721 (4th ed. 2006). [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:00 am
Weir, 455 U.S. 603 (1982) (per curiam) (holding that cross-examining a defendant regarding his silence after arrest but before Miranda warnings are given does not violate due process). [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 3:29 pm
Collection of previous "practice tips", through 1/20/09. [read post]
