Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-10, Inclusive" Results 241 - 260 of 762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2022, 7:30 am by Alex Phipps
Structured Sentencing Act does not require trial court to apply mitigating factors when sentencing defendant within the presumptive range for offense. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
As I’ve mentioned many times, lawsuits over buying competitors’ trademarks haven’t succeeded in court for about a half-decade; and even lawsuits over the inclusion of a competitor’s trademark in the ad copy rarely make much progress in court any more. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 12:42 pm
Should this effort be conducted at individual treaty levels or is there a need for a broader and inclusive discussion, for example at ICSID? [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Nonetheless, on August 10, 2018, Ganske's employment was terminated, purportedly "because of Mensch's tweets. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:26 am
State of Indiana , a 9-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Riley writes:Appellant-Defendant, Lisa Dawn Owens (Owens), appeals the trial court's denial of her Motion for Sentence Modification. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
”  BSMG ¶10 (quoting ¶3(1) of the EU product liability directive).The most important facts of BSMG were the manufacturer’s product-related communications.As to the pacemakers, the manufacturer sent a recall letter stating that a “component” could “experience a gradual degradation” causing “premature battery depletion” that could cause the device to stop functioning “without warning. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
EU law does not expressly prohibit such derogation. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  She explained that previously they did not want to buy products through an agent as they would have to pay commission, but suggested a discount of 10%. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
  Accordingly, on June 28, 2010, the plaintiffs substituted Invizion as a Doe defendant, and on July 6, 2010, the plaintiffs served Invizion’s agent for service of process in California with the Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
I am satisfied that the total amount referred to under step 1 does not exclude the element of Housing Benefit. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Let us consider each of these three contentions in turn, for each has a complicated story behind it–a story that does not favor the plurality’s conclusion. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The Elonis case illustrates why inclusion of recklessness is necessary. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Bob Farb
App. 574 (1990) (drug sales at two other motel rooms within 10-day period supported search of another motel room); State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Bob Farb
App. 574 (1990) (drug sales at two other motel rooms within 10-day period supported search of another motel room); State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
Several of these issues were also tackled by the February 2010 Report of the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, Press Standards, Privacy and Libel (Second Report of Session 2009-10 HC 362-1). [read post]