Search for: "Doe et al v. Harris et al"
Results 241 - 260
of 308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
Mar. 12, 2010)(illegal immigrant status of defendant's driver in truck-car collision case held prejudicial in jury trial; new trial ordered)TXI TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ET AL. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Shelton, et al., Study of Juror Expectations and Demands Concerning Scientific Evidence: Does the CSI Effect Exist? [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
” Kearns et al., supra § 11.V.B., at 687; see alsoH.R. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:10 pm
Antec et al (CAFC 2009-1248, -1249) precedential Summary Judgment Motion Antec wanted a mulligan on its summary judgment motion. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Just because the American people sometimes make choices that policymakers find distasteful, it does not mean that citizens don’t have good choices at their disposal. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One reason is the limited degree of uniformity created by the New York Convention which does not entirely eliminate differences between the national jurisdictions (especially in the context of arbitrability and public policy).11 The perspective of European law is different. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:31 pm
Harris v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:14 pm
The case of Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
For those of you who haven't been following the story, here's a brief recap, shamelessly borrowing from William's prior posts: Jones, et al., were investors in mutual funds managed by Harris Associates, an investment adviser. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 pm
Oct. 23, 2009)(per curiam) (opinion on denial of motion for rehearing) (limited discovery prior to arbitration sometimes permissible) IN RE HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY, L.P., ET AL.; from Victoria County;13th district (13-07-00299-CV & 13-07-00362-CV, 269SW3d 90, 08-26-08). [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:30 am
V. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
HICKS, ET AL.; from Anderson County;14th district (14? [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
"Graham v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
WW, LLC, et al. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:03 pm
Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, for amici curiae Apple Inc., et al. and James W. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
On September 3, 2009, twenty-five corporate law and finance professors and scholars - including several contributors to this blog - filed an amici curiae brief in the case of Jones et al. v. [read post]
