Search for: "Doe v. Becerra" Results 241 - 260 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Becerra, a First Amendment challenge by crisis-pregnancy centers to a California law requiring disclosures about the availability of publicly funded family-planning services, arguing that “the California law does not violate the First Amendment” because it “doesn’t compel the clinics to say or not say anything, only to post truthful information provided by the state. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Julie Rikelman
Becerra, a case about provisions in the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by John Elwood
Becerra, 16-1146, and Livingwell Medical Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
Becerra, 16-1153 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-9282  Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm by Aurora Barnes
Becerra 16-1153 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am by Aurora Barnes
Becerra 16-1153 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am by John Elwood
Alabama, 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Becerra, 16-1146, and Livingwell Medical Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am by Aurora Barnes
Becerra 16-1153 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:36 pm
 You'll likely get other opinions written on the same subject as additional states join the anti-foie gras bandwagon, but this one's a pretty good template for how the analysis will go.Judge Nguyen does make an interesting observation in upholding California's prohibition. [read post]