Search for: "Doe v. Phillips"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm
The Court of Appeals affirms the verdict.The case is Mulholland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
" (Phillips v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
” * In contrast, in Christopher v Phillips, 160 A.D.2d 1165, motion to appeal denied, 76 N.Y.2d 706, the court ruled that “if a hearing is not required by law, the substantial evidence standard of review does not apply [and] the appropriate standard for the purpose of judicial review [in such a situation] is whether the determination is arbitrary or capricious. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
” —Touche Ross & Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, supporting the principle that the First Amendment does not permit Colorado public accommodations law to force independent baker Jack Phillips to create a cake intended for a same-sex wedding in which he does not wish to participate. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:11 pm
Cir. 2012) (citing Phillips v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Phillips. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
In Brinkley v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am
"Craven" seems like a better adjective.Fortunately, the Pentagon has less of a problem with Judge Phillips' order than the White House does. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:06 am
I don't mean to suggest they have better DNA than the rest of us: I'm more incline to ascribe it to us v them as in "small country" v "the world." [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
These decisions are Phillips et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:26 am
Phillip L. [read post]
21 May 2016, 5:42 am
Co. of Sw. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:12 pm
(See Murphy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
Although the Hargreaves Review does not deal with end user consumption, this is an issue that will now need to be addressed, given the controversy created by NLA v Meltwater. [read post]