Search for: "Doe v. Schneider"
Results 241 - 260
of 275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Preliminary question: does applicant own copyright it is seeking to enforce: Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited (LawFont) Canada Canadian copyright collecting agency subverting open debate on copyright (Boing Boing) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) CMEC seeks review of K-12 Copyright Board tariff (Excess Copyright) The return of Captain Copyright? [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:28 pm
(Stryker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 9:53 am
Flanagan v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
A recent decision from the California Court of Appeal, Bode v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:43 am
On Monday, May 18, the Supreme Court announced its decision in AT&T v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
As reported extensively, in Chint v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Katz Technology Licensing drops Covington & Burling as counsel (Law 360) Economic downturn = downturn in patent filings (PatentlyO) Challenging the strong presumption of patent validity (PatentlyO) USPTO Extends patent prosecution highway pilot with Australia and begins pilot with Germany (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions Jury awards Uniloc $388m in patent suit v Microsoft (Law 360) (IP Down Under) CAFC finds for Honda in defending truck bed patent suit by… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
Okay, so what does this mean? [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
Laing, 43 AD3d 713, 715 [1st Dept 2007]; see also Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot, v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oleg Teterin seeks ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ for rights to use ;-) emoticon, a registered Russian trade mark (Techdirt) (RelatIP) (Ars Technica) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law) (Class 46) New UK copyright consultation: consultation issues include access to works, incentivising investment and creativity, recognising… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:42 pm
Of course, in his defense, the Article 15.22 part of the opinion does seem like an afterthought.]Stephen Ruffin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:40 pm
I think the answer should be "no"--see Schneider v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
The mere fact that an [product] defect arises does not establish, in and of itself, an actual and ascertainable loss to the [product] purchaser.872 A.2d at 794. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 2:02 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
Section 707(b)(3)'s totality of the circumstances test applies even if the presumption of abuse pursuant to section 707(b)(2) does not arise or is rebutted.The court applied the test adopted by the Fourth Circuit in Green v. [read post]
