Search for: "Doe v. Selective Service System"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.The opinion goes on to explain that [t]he unambiguous language of the statute makes clear that a violation has occurred when a defendant has: (1) intentionally and (2) without authorization or by exceeding valid authorization (3) accessed or caused access to be made to a computer program, computer, computer system, or computer network (4) to acquire, alter, damage, delete, or destroy property or otherwise use the services of a computer program, computer, computer… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:32 am
v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
” Id.[10] The panel did agree with EOIR that the DCO had no duty to select Vaz’s complaint for an expedited investigation. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
cellular telephone service . . . or any service for which the called party is charged for the call. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:46 am
Everest for Faking Photo * Wired: How Covid Gums Up the Court System * Les Giblin LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(IP Spotlight) (IPBiz) CAFC: Does a patent license include related patents? [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Its compilation is a service to the field, but the work is more theorized than the compliment “service to the field” often connotes. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:14 am
Does 1-1017 (TorrentFreak) District Court C D California: Cease & desist letter to iTunes isn’t covered by 17 USC 512(f): Red Rock v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
The first is sympathy for the development of an independent and merit-based civil-service system. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
It is hardly useful to have those deeply invested in the system to talk about the system itself, without inevitably engaging in the performance of the system. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division reasoned that "because the RSSL expressly makes the childcare leave service credit benefit in question available to correction officers, but does not expressly confer the same benefit upon police officers, the legislature meant to nullify the part of the Administrative Code allowing the buyback to police members of the retirement system. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division reasoned that "because the RSSL expressly makes the childcare leave service credit benefit in question available to correction officers, but does not expressly confer the same benefit upon police officers, the legislature meant to nullify the part of the Administrative Code allowing the buyback to police members of the retirement system. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 8:54 am
However, following the 2014 Loving v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:05 am
The Edmonton case perked the ears of politicians and courts alike to ensure that the backlash does not befell their own systems. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:26 am
The practice of permitting a voir dire of all potential jurors in order to determine their views prior to selection for jury service does not exist. [read post]
