Search for: "Doe v. Shapiro"
Results 241 - 260
of 668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
"Which interpretation," Shapiro's legal conservative would ask, "does the least damage to the pre-existing fabric of the law? [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:33 am
Khouzam v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
That timing does not appear to be accidental. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Unlike Chevron it does not yield a single doctrinal test that can be easily remembered and recited like a magical incantation. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument March 23 in the case of Walker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
In Voisine v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am
Shapiro disagreed with Smith’s assertion that Citizens United was based on novel fact-finding by Kennedy, characterizing the decision as an analysis, “grounded in law,” about what the text of the Constitution does or does not allow. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
But they should not be obligated to do so.Lemley-Shapiro paper promotes Google's preferred arbitration method and reflects unconcealed anti-Apple, anti-Microsoft biasTwo well-known California professors, Stanford's Mark Lemley (patent law) and Berkeley's Carl Shapiro (competition economics), have published a pro-Google policy paper on FRAND rate-setting styled as an academic working paper, entitled "A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents". [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:55 am
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Thaya Brook Knight and Ilya Shapiro discuss the institute’s amicus brief in Lucia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:35 am
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law George Washington University Law School. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 2:03 pm
The need for such narrow construction is particularly strong in this case, she asserted, because the statute under which defendants are prosecuted for insider trading does not actually define the elements of insider trading. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Yesterday’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:18 pm
Shapiro v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am
, Kokesh v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 2:00 am
Union Free School District, 395 U.S. 621, 627 (1969); Shapiro v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
In the earlier case of Vringo v. [read post]
