Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 241 - 260 of 15,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 9:54 am by ashleystjohn
Insider Trading (Corporate Law 1), edited by Stephen M. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).Claim 1 of the main request on file read:1. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:50 am by admin
 That would be a violation of Section 23(1). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:50 am by Matt C. Bailey
  While the Court's standard likely will substantially impact certification under Rule 23(b)(1) and (b)(2) moving forward, it is unlikely to have significant impact Rule 23(b)(3) certification. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, inasmuch as plaintiff's complaint does not state any cognizable claim in law or in equity, it must be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Heffez, 56 AD3d at 526; Simmons, 32 AD3d at 465). [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 3:58 pm by SOIssues
Original Article Chapter 23 SEXUAL OFFENDERS AND SEXUAL PREDATORS Sec. 23-1. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:06 am by Eleonora Rosati
Like the other economic rights harmonised in the InfoSoc Directive, the right of communication to the public “should be understood in a broad sense” (recital 23).The two key requirements of art. 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive are a ‘communication’ directed at a ‘public’. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
FL1 distinguishes FL4 Rabb case: a dog sniff in a common hallway does not violate the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
LEXIS 65 (March 23, 2010), Certiorari Denied, May 5, 2010, No. 32,318.* The District Court’s decision is supported by the record. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:14 am by WSLL
The property division stands as does the award of alimony to Mother. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:39 am
Thus, we hold that the 2004 Amendment does not violate the Fourth Amendment, and we affirm. [read post]