Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2016, 6:09 am
But he does say this:Minority voters are a different matter. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 10:11 pm
Weems, No. 115811 -- Issues Presented: Do the 2012 amendments to the State Employee Insurance Act, 5 ILCS 375/1, violate (1) the Pension Protection Clause, Ill. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
However, a quirk in the rules regarding discovery is that a Defendant does not have to serve responses to such discovery requests until 45 days after service of the summons and complaint. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Eller & Co., 41 Ben. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Eller & Co., 41 Ben. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:00 am
I wrote about this issue in "Ethical Ends and Ethical Means," 41 Jour. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:18 pm
” No Showing of Miscarriage of Justice Put simply, the Fifth Circuit said it does not “view the fourth prong as automatic if the other three prongs are met. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
MIP filed a notice of opposition ex Article 42 of Regulation 40/94 (Article 41 CTMR), relying on Article 8(1)(b) of the same Regulation. macros consult GmbH, on the other hand, submitted an application for a declaration of invalidity of MIP's figurative sign, under Articles 52(1)(c) and 55 of Regulation 40/94 (Articles 53(1)(c) and 56 CTMR). [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:12 am
Docket Entry ("DE") 1 at 1. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:41 am
The existence of multiple versions or adaptions does not affect the fact that ‘Le Journal d’Anne Frank’ is the unique and distinctive title of a specific book. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
Leuthold does not refer to this authority and instead relies on paragraph 2.4(1)(c) of the Copyright Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:31 pm
.* A Rule 41(g) motion does not require that the search be illegal. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:42 am
The existence of another, alternative rational conclusion does not warrant annulment of the appointing authority’s conclusion that Peil was guilty of the charges preferred against him, citing Incorporated Vill. of Lake Success v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 41 AD3d 599.* Text of decision e-mailed to registered readers. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am
The first examiner indicated that in his opinion claim 1 now on file suffers from the same deficiency as claim 1 as originally filed. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:35 am
Only five of the 41 Fortune 500 companies in the technology sector have a woman CEO. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:43 am
It's not droit to a suite ...Article 1(4) further states that:"The royalty shall be payable by the seller. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
On Thursday, the Supreme Court passed the proposed change to Rule 41 and sent it to Congress on Thursday, which will have until December 1 to modify, reject, or defer the proposal. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:58 am
The ordinance does not change lobbyist registration or reporting dates, but does add definitions, gift restrictions, and penalties for violations. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:37 pm
LRS answered that this fact does not in itself mean that a third party may exploit the research results by means of a compulsory license. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 2:03 am
The EUIPO Examiner had refused to register the trade mark applied for on the basis of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) EUTMR, finding it partially descriptive and devoid of distinctive character. [read post]
