Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am
The Board carefully assessed the applicability of Art. 84 EPC as well as of Rule 42(1)(c) and Rule 48(1)(c) EPC as possible legal basis requiring adaptation of the description, and concluded that such basis does not exist (except possible in the case of non-unity). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:15 pm
Note that Reese’s Law also provides labeling requirements for the packaging of button cell and coin batteries themselves, which the UL 4200A-23 standard does not address. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The decision discusses alleged conflicting or at least diverging application of G 1/92, as well as G 1/92 itself, in detail. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:29 am
This blog does not give legal advice. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Does 1-88, 2013 US Dist. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:08 pm
Channel 6 stations operate on 82-88 MHz, and the FM radio band starts at 88.1 MHz. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 1:23 pm
Oscar Levant 88. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:12 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:40 am
Diocese of Camden, 88 N.J. 571, 588 (1982). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:02 am
Martin, 35 Misc 3d 133(A), 951 N.Y.S.2d 88 (App Term 9th and 10th Dists 2012). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 6:34 am
The work the IAC does matters, and my team and I follow your recommendations closely. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
What does this all mean for 2008? [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 6:34 am
The work the IAC does matters, and my team and I follow your recommendations closely. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 8:07 am
,” 88 Journal New York State Bar Association 28, June 2016. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
The identification of this effect however does not require any ingenuity. [2.5] Therefore, the use as defined in claim 1 in accordance with the auxiliary request does not involve an inventive step as required by A 56. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:50 am
Arrigo, 88 N.J. 529, 545 (1982)). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
§ 9792.21.1(d)(1), other medical treatment guidelines such as the ACOEM and ODG at 8 Cal. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of auxiliary request I therefore does not fulfil the requirements of clarity pursuant to A 84. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:28 am
How does this play out? [read post]
