Search for: "Does I & II" Results 241 - 260 of 23,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The CJEU then went on to reiterate its conclusions in the Austria Post case (see our blog here on that case) as to the conditions that must be satisfied for non-material damages to be awarded, namely: (i) the individual suffered damage; (ii) there was an infringement of the GDPR; and (iii) there is a causal link between the damage and the infringement. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Vladyslav Lanovoy
I of the Genocide Convention (Statement of Facts and Grounds for Judicial Review (SoF) [124]). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Part II briefly recounts the main plot of this story, marking three milestones in the development of the CJEU’s case law thus far. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:40 am by Dennis Crouch
” Under the current patent venue statute, a civil action for patent infringement may be brought either (i) in the judicial district where the defendant resides or (ii) where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  As explained in Part I below, the State of Idaho’s emergency application asks us to override the decisions of two lower courts based on an issue not clearly implicated and under circumstances where the State does not contest that its law should remain enjoined as likely unconstitutional, at least as applied to the plaintiffs. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:00 pm by Robert Laplaca
A charity that (i) solicits donations online, (ii) grants funds to other charities based on a person’s online activity, or (iii) permits its name to be referenced or listed as a recipient of online solicitations. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thus, she may have to use the patient portal even if she does not return as a patient. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm by Giles Peaker
RBKC argued i) On the face of it, Part 4 of the Equality Act 2010 applies. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Following an introduction, in Part II I explicate the tort of trespass and the right to exclude at its heart. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Right now, Nebraska (along with Maine) does not allocate presidential electors in a winner-take-all fashion. [read post]