Search for: "Downloader 81" Results 241 - 260 of 342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
Fixed links grew to 82 million subscriptions, up from 81 the previous year. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As there are no reasons to doubt that the remaining admissibility requirements are fulfilled, the appeal against this decision is admissible.We shall have a look at the allowability of the appeal in a forthcoming post.Should you wish to download the whole document (in German), just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:45 am
Article published in 81 New York State Bar Journal on p. 30 November/December, 2009. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the examination of whether the proposed solution successfully solves this problem is limited to the other features of claim 1 (T 22/81 [5.1,7]; T 26/01 [4.3] and T 176/04 [5.5]). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:40 am by Kelly
The details of the expansion can be found in the IRS budget request (downloads as a pdf). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The question facing the Board in the present case is whether the OD had exercised its discretion correctly. [3] Whilst the OD is entitled, pursuant to R 81(1) to examine grounds for opposition not invoked by the opponent, the circumstances in which an OD should consider raising a ground of its own volition are set out in the decisions of the Enlarged Board (EBA) G 9/91 and G 10/91. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:01 am
The reports of his appearance before that Committee were lost in the ensuing Thanksgiving festivities and the related brouhaha over TSA body scans, but you can still access a modified version of his written testimony online (.pdf download here). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am by Sam Gustin
See Also: Appeals Court: Pirate Bay Admins Still Guilty, Now With Higher Fines Bill Would Give Justice Department Power to Shutter Piracy Sites Final Guilty Plea Wraps Up Federal ‘Warez’ Crackdown Complete List of Domain Names Seized By ICE 1. 2009jerseys.com 2. 51607.com 3. amoyhy.com 4. b2corder.com 5. bishoe.com 6. borntrade.com 7. borntrade.net 8. boxedtvseries.com 9. boxset4less.com 10. boxsetseries.com 11. burberryoutletshop.com 12. burberryoutlet-us.com 13. cartoon77.com 14.… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[7.1] According to the established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal it is necessary, in order to assess inventive step, to establish the closest state of the art, to determine in the light thereof the technical problem which the invention addresses and successfully solves, and to examine the obviousness of the claimed solution to this problem in view of the state of the art. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by cap95
.): http://oce.house.gov/pdf/20090127_rules_as_adopted.pdf 2007 Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007 -- P.L. 110-81, 121 Stat. 735, Sept. 14, 2007. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:17 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
Bernardo Vieira de Melo, 1624 – Piedade, Joaboatão dos Guararapes Informações: (81) 3463.0206 | 3463.0729 Data: 05 de novembro Sessão de autógrafos na OAB/PE – 19h: Rua do Imperador Pedro II, nº 235 – Santo Antônio | Recife/PE Telefone: (81) 3424-1012 Download as PDF [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:48 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
O uso das plataformas móveis também é um pesadelo para os gestores – 81% temem perda do controle sobre os dados. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm
Guests: Karl Susman and Marty Schwimmer Download or subscribe to this show at twit.tv/twil. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:45 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
“O que surpreendeu a gente é que a liminar fala em folhas 80 e 81 do processo. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
Download the article from SSRN at the link. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In a communication pursuant to A 101(1) and R 81(2) to (3) sent to the parties on 16 April 2008, the OD requested the patentee to provide, within a period of four months of notification of the communication, a description adapted to claims 1 to 27 of the first auxiliary request filed during the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board. [4] On 28 April 2008, opponent 04 inquired by fax […] whether the OD wanted the opponents to file observations within the same time period set for the… [read post]