Search for: "Doyle v. Doyle"
Results 241 - 260
of 692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
In the case of Reid v Dukic [2016] ACTSC 344, a man who posted a series of Facebook posts defaming the chief executive of a Canberra football organisation has been ordered to pay her damages of $180,000. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:29 am
Carl Folsom won in State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:17 pm
The Eighth Circuit’s decision, Doyle v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:17 pm
The Eighth Circuit’s decision, Doyle v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 2:58 pm
Lenin (under the name of Jacob Richter), Bram Stoker, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and H. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 2:08 pm
United States — should be influenced by what the Court decided last month in Burrage v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
The Doyle estatewould presumably argue that the copyrights on the characters as portrayed in IV, V, and VI will not expire until thecopyrights on I, II, and III expire. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:51 am
" [§167.2, Civil Service Law].The Doyle decision is posted on the Internet at:http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case? [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:03 am
Maw v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:03 am
Maw v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
The Queen in Right of Canada, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 643, Doyle Construction Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:29 am
Notice of claim pursuant to Education Law §3813 CSEA v West Islip UFSD, Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Justice Doyle, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] Justice Doyle, holding that “is well established that as a condition precedent to an action against a school district, Education Law Section 3813 requires that a notice of claim be presented to the governing body of the school district within 90 days from the accrual of the claim,”… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 4:21 pm
Two recent decisions, Economou v de Freitas and Doyle v Smith, provide some guidance on this question, but seem to pull in slightly different directions. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am
STATUTE OF FRAUDS IN THE ESTATE CODE [formerly PROBATE CODE]DOOMS CLAIM BY FORMER GIRLFRIEND WHO WAS CUT OUT OF THE WILL; -- PROMISE HELD UNENFORCEABLE In re Estate of Jack C. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:24 am
Co v Cirucci, 46 NY2d 862, 864 [1979]; City of Kingston v Harco Nat. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:57 pm
Moore v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 7:18 am
In Appling v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:02 am
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:16 pm
Ellen v. [read post]
