Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont"
Results 241 - 260
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 3:15 am
Mini Melts, Inc. v Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Opposition No. 91173963 (April 27, 2016) [precedential].Likelihood of Confusion: Not surprisingly, the Board found the marks to be virtually identical, and therefore this first du Pont factor weighed heavily in opposer's favor. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 am
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 am
Cards Against Humanity, LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:55 am
DreTurning to the fifth du Pont factor, the strength of opposer's mark, the Board found DR. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 3:36 am
There must be substantial harm to the worker to establish a claim for fraud, conspiracy to defraud, or intentional injury against the employer.New Jersey LawIn the Millison claim, former employees at E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company were examined during their employment by company physicians who knew the plaintiffs' exposure to asbestos and the resulting disease., appeal after remand Million v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:20 am
The North Face Apparel Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:53 am
”Conclusion: Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely and sustained the opposition. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
Du Pont De Nemours & Co., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (S.D.W.V. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
" Opposer contended that it needed additional discovery under FRCP 56(f), but the Board noted that Applicant had conceded all the du Pont factors except for the dissimilarity in the marks, and further that Opposer had been able to address that issue substantively in its brief.Turning to the substance, the Board likened this case to Kellogg v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 12:05 pm
The appellate court opined that the Board had correctly applied the du Pont factors and had properly considered Appellee's co-existence agreement with the owner of the registered mark ANTHONY'S PIZZA THE WORLD'S GREATEST. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 10:13 pm
., substituted for Universal Music Group v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:32 pm
Jansen Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
See Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
See Teledyne Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
The motion was filed after the close of the testimony period, and the Board found that B&D had unduly delayed in filing its motion.Turning to the du Pont analysis, the Board rooted its way through the record evidence, beginning with B&D's family-of-marks claim. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:06 pm
EI du Pont de Nemours & Co., 501 A. 2d 505 - NJ: Supreme Court 1985, Laidlow v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:36 am
" Golfino AG v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:47 am
E.I. du Pont de Nemours, in the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
How would you rule in Odom's Tennessee Pride Sausage, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
In 1802 he sold the house and mills to Eleuthère Irénée du Pont, who founded his gunpowder mills there. [read post]
